SCOTUS Says No Affirmative Action in College Admissions

SCOTUS Says No Affirmative Action in College Admissions
Attorney General Sean Reyes (Utah) — ttorney General Sean Reyes Official Website (https://attorneygeneral.utah.gov/news/)
0Comments

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, ruling that public universities may no longer base admissions standards on students’ race, which violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In a 6-3 vote, the historic opinion by the Court reversed earlier judgments by the District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina and the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The case involved challenges to the admissions standards of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the Court, and he was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. 

In their prevailing opinion, the six justices wrote, “Both programs (Harvard and UNC admissions) lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably negatively employ race, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful endpoints. We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today…. the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual – not based on race. Many universities have for too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned by the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.” 

General Reyes previously joined a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and an Amicus brief, both led by Oklahoma, in support of Students for Fair Admissions. In the Amicus brief, the attorneys general stated, “…some of Amici States have prohibited racial classifications in university admissions and yet successfully maintain diverse campuses that are inclusive and equally open to students of any race. Respondents’ claim in this case that such diversity is impossible without engaging in racial discrimination is contradicted by the experience of our public universities that provide the highest quality education to all without regard to skin color or ethnicity.”  

Read the U.S. Supreme Court opinion here.

Read the Writ of Certiorari of Oklahoma and other states here. 

Read the Amicus Brief of Oklahoma and other states here. 

Original source can be found here.          



Related

Sen. Mike Lee, U.S. Senator for Utah

Sen. Mike Lee introduces bill to ease Jones Act restrictions on domestic shipping

Senator Mike Lee has introduced new legislation aimed at easing shipping restrictions under the Jones Act for certain American-made goods such as liquefied natural gas (LNG). The bill seeks expedited waivers when no compliant vessels exist so that domestic producers can better serve U.S markets.

Sen. Mike Lee, U.S. Senator for Utah

Senators introduce bipartisan bill to reform government surveillance and protect privacy rights

Senator Mike Lee has introduced a bipartisan bill aiming to reform government surveillance practices while safeguarding Americans’ privacy rights. The Government Surveillance Reform Act proposes new limits on federal access to personal data under FISA Section 702.

John Curtis, U.S. Senator from Utah

Senators Curtis and King announce support for Fiscal Commission Act to address national debt

Senators John Curtis and Angus King announced widespread support for their Fiscal Commission Act aimed at addressing U.S. national debt exceeding $38 trillion. Stakeholders from across political lines say a bipartisan commission could help stabilize spending and guide future policy decisions.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Beehive State News.